Publish or perish11/14/2023 ![]() ![]() ![]() The search is available through author name, publication name, title words, keywords, years of publication (exact year or range), and ISSN tag. The app features a simple but dense interface that can help users easily search, sort, and analyze their search strings in mere seconds. The databases accessible from this application even include sources such as Microsoft Academic Search (MSA) and Google Scholar (GS), which enables users to complete their citation search from within one app, with no need to visit any other source. However, its built-in tools for searching, sorting and processing of citations make this tool particularly suitable to students and other academic scholars who want to data-mine for valuable data found in citations. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 16(1), 1–6.Publish or Perish is a free education and office software designed from the ground up to provide anyone with instant access to an incredibly large database of citations. A systematic review: Students with mental health problems-A growing problem. ![]() Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Publish or perish, but at what cost? Journal of Clinical Investigation, 118(7), 2368–2368. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(3), 196–217. HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known. The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science. A tragedy of the (academic) commons: interpreting the replication crisis in psychology as a social dilemma for early-career researchers. Evidence for a mental health crisis in graduate education. We hope that by sharing our main concerns, we can stimulate a discussion of potential solutions, such as being judged on the scientific quality of our work over the quantity.ĭe Rond, M., & Miller, A. This makes the publish-or-perish culture very hard to escape, and eventually maintains itself as a vicious cycle. In order to obtain future positions and grants, PhD students are mainly judged on quantity and impact factors. Evidently, these three issues do not impact solely the confidence and integrity of young researchers, but science at large. Third, the pressure can result in less replication studies, since these studies are less rewarded or valued, contributing to the reproducibility crisis in science (Everett & Earp, 2015 Open Science Collaboration, 2015). Pre-registration has been suggested as a solution to these practices (Munafò et al., 2017), but this requires more time and preparation and is thus often discarded. Second, the pressure can result in more unsavoury scientific practices, such as p-hacking (Head, Holman, Lanfear, Kahn, & Jennions, 2015) or harking (Kerr, 1998), in order to make unexpected- or null-results more publishable. Additionally, PhD candidates more often complete only one complex time-consuming study, which are then fragmented into multiple manuscripts containing “minimal publishable units” (Neill, 2008), whereby the greater picture is lost. High-quality but time-consuming studies to perform, such as clinical patient studies or longitudinal studies, often get pushed aside in favour of subclinical and cross-sectional studies. First, the pressure can result in less innovative low-risk/low-reward studies (De Rond & Miller, 2005), in order to obtain significant results. This is especially true considering other duties during a PhD, such as teaching, following courses, attending conferences, and completing a stay abroad in another lab.ĭue to this time pressure, PhD students could feel like they have to sacrifice scientific quality in order to publish enough, in the following three ways. However, three or four years is a very short time for a young researcher to get to know the field well-enough to design a good experiment, collect data with enough statistical power, (learn how to) analyze it, and write a high-quality manuscript let alone repeat that process multiple times. Besides limited access to mental health support and poor work-life-balance, we believe that one of the causes of these mental health problems could be the pressure caused by the publish-or-perish culture.Ī European PhD student generally is allowed only three to four years to complete the PhD, and often needs to be completed with at least three publications in order to remain competitive. It has been reported that PhD students have an up to six times increased risk of mental health problems compared to the general population (Evans, Bira, Gastelum, Weiss, & Vanderford, 2018 Storrie, Ahern, & Tuckett, 2010). Many PhD students experience great pressure during their PhD. Rattel, Malgorzata Wislowska, Michael Hahn, Sara Fernández-Cabello, and Elie Rassi. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |